THE REALITY OF VENTURA RANCH — FACT VS. CLAIM

THE REALITY OF VENTURA RANCH — FACT VS. CLAIMTHE REALITY OF VENTURA RANCH — FACT VS. CLAIMTHE REALITY OF VENTURA RANCH — FACT VS. CLAIM
STAND WITH US
LIFE SAFETY IGNORED
Wildlife habitat
FINAL TAKE

THE REALITY OF VENTURA RANCH — FACT VS. CLAIM

THE REALITY OF VENTURA RANCH — FACT VS. CLAIMTHE REALITY OF VENTURA RANCH — FACT VS. CLAIMTHE REALITY OF VENTURA RANCH — FACT VS. CLAIM
STAND WITH US
LIFE SAFETY IGNORED
Wildlife habitat
FINAL TAKE
More
  • STAND WITH US
  • LIFE SAFETY IGNORED
  • Wildlife habitat
  • FINAL TAKE
  • STAND WITH US
  • LIFE SAFETY IGNORED
  • Wildlife habitat
  • FINAL TAKE

BE A VOICE FOR FARMWORKER SAFETY. SHOW THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WE WONT STAND BY QUIETLY!


My name is Steve

Thank you for visiting my site.

I want to say briefly why I have stayed with this project so closely over the past three and a half years.

This isn’t just about maps or reports to me. This project is intended for farmworker families — people who already work under difficult conditions to support this region. Many of those families include children, limited transportation, and less flexibility when something goes wrong.

As I worked through the administrative record, what became clear is that these systems — fire access, evacuation, flood risk — are being analyzed separately, but not together the way they would actually affect people in a real emergency.

And that’s what concerned me. Because in real life, those conditions don’t happen one at a time — they happen all at once.

I did not come to these conclusions lightly. They come directly from the County’s own record. And that record does not demonstrate that these life‑safety questions have been resolved.

I’m asking you to take a careful look at whether this project, as currently presented, is truly safe for the families it is intended to serve — and for the surrounding community as well.


Life Safety Was Acknowledged — Then Set Aside

Ventura Ranch Farmworker Housing (PL23‑0051)

Show up May 19, 1:30pm 800 S. Victoria Ave to show support for Farmworker Safety and Public Safety at the Board of Supervisors hearing pertaining to the Planning Commission Approval Appeal. 



❗ BUILT FAR FROM EVERYTHING — EXPOSED TO EVERYTHING

Why is farmworker housing being placed far from jobs, far from services, and directly in a high‑risk location?

      

🚜 DISCONNECTED FROM FARM EMPLOYMENT

Ventura Ranch is located well north of the County’s primary agricultural areas.

That means:

  • longer daily commutes to work
  • higher transportation costs
  • more time away from family

Housing that is meant to reduce hardship should not require workers to travel farther just to reach their jobs.

🏫 FAR FROM DAILY LIFE NECESSITIES

Farmworker housing is family housing.

Families need:

  • schools
  • childcare
  • healthcare
  • groceries
  • basic community services

This location is disconnected from all of them.

👉 Every basic need requires a drive.

⚠️ LOCATION + RISK = A MUCH BIGGER PROBLEM

This isn’t just an issue of inconvenience.

It becomes a serious safety problem when combined with the risks already present at this site:

  • 🔥 Located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone
  • 🚧 Limited access routes
  • 🌧️ Access roads that are known to flood
  • ☣️ Documented pesticide exposure surrounding the area
  • 🚑 Distance from emergency services

🚨 WHAT THIS MEANS FOR DAILY LIFE

Because of the location, families will face constant exposure to risk:

  • more time on dangerous roads
  • greater evacuation risk during wildfire emergencies
  • delayed emergency response times
  • unavoidable exposure to environmental hazards

Everything — work, school, food, medical care — requires travel.

That means risk is built into daily life.

🔴 THIS DOES NOT REDUCE HARDSHIP

A project that forces farmworker families to drive farther for every basic need:

👉 does not reduce hardship

A project that places families in a high‑risk hazard zone:

👉 does not protect them

✅ FINAL POINT

Housing meant to support farmworkers should be:

  • located near jobs
  • connected to community
  • safe for families

This project does the opposite

WHY “DEEMED COMPLETE” DOES NOT OVERRIDE health and safety

The public deserves to know that safety was not the deciding factor in approving the Ventura Ranch project. Despite significant unresolved concerns, the Planning Commission approved a proposal that places both future residents and the surrounding community at risk. We believe those risks cannot be ignored — and we will continue to challenge this decision.

 

🔥 WHY “DEEMED COMPLETE” DOES NOT OVERRIDE FIRE SAFETY LAW

Ventura Ranch Partners claim this project should be allowed because the application was “deemed complete” before the site was designated a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.

They argue the project is “grandfathered.”

That is not how the law works.

 

🧠 What HAA actually says (in simple terms)

The Housing Accountability Act (HAA):

  • Limits the County’s ability to deny housing projects
  • BUT only if the project: 
    • complies with objective standards, AND
    • does not create a specific, adverse health or safety impact [hcd.ca.gov]

👉 If there IS a real safety impact, the County can still deny it
👉 But they must make clear findings supported by evidence


❗ “DEEMED COMPLETE” DOES NOT GIVE THE RIGHT TO BUILD

It only requires the County to continue processing the application

It does not create a vested right to build

Vested rights only arise after: 

valid building permits are issued

and construction has begun

Neither of those happened here.


🚨 FIRE SAFETY LAWS STILL APPLY

Wildfire regulations are not ordinary zoning rules.

They are life‑safety protections, and the County has the authority—and responsibility—to apply updated safety standards to pending projects.

Fire risk does not depend on filing dates

Evacuation danger does not disappear because paperwork was submitted earlier


⚖️ COUNTY LAW IS CLEAR

Ventura County’s Agricultural Worker Housing Ordinance states:

👉 A farmworker housing complex is prohibited in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone

There is no exception for “deemed complete” applications

There is no grandfather clause

If the County intended an exception, it would have written one.

It did not.


🚫 THIS PROJECT IGNORES THAT PROHIBITION

The proposal attempts to place a large, permanent residential complex for families in a location the County has already identified as high‑risk for wildfire.

That directly conflicts with the purpose of the ordinance.


🔥 SAFETY RULES PROTECT PEOPLE — NOT PROJECTS

Farmworker housing is supposed to reduce vulnerability, not increase it.

Calling this project “grandfathered” does not change:

wildfire behavior

evacuation limitations

real‑world danger


✅ FINAL POINT

When the law clearly prohibits farmworker housing in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones,

that prohibition must be honored


    Copyright © 2024 No Ventura Ranch - All Rights Reserved.

    • STAND WITH US
    • LIFE SAFETY IGNORED
    • Wildlife habitat

    Powered by